Why is the sky blue?

Why is the sky blue? This is the cliche question that is the rite of passage of parenthood. Before my children were old enough to ask this question I researched the answer in anticipation.

The blue sky we know so well

The blue sky we know so well

The answer the Internet gave me is:

A clear cloudless day-time sky is blue because molecules in the air scatter blue light from the sun more than they scatter red light. When we look towards the sun at sunset, we see red and orange colours because the blue light has been scattered out and away from the line of sight.

This answer anticipates that children may also ask: why is the sky sometimes orange? Or, why is sky sometimes red? But the first question they will ask is: why is the sky blue?

Last Sunday I visited the Herbert Art Gallery in Coventry with my family. There were three highlights to the visit, the ‘The Story of Children’s TV’ exhibition, ‘The History of Us’ installation and a George Shaw painting. I am in awe of George Shaw’s work. He paints the ordinary and the mundane. He paints abandoned places which are scenes from his childhood, and he paints them simultaneously devoid and full of life. In addition, he is able to portray atmosphere through colour (using enamel paints normally associated with model planes). This was the first time I’d had the opportunity to see a George Shaw painting and I was very excited.

I had a number of thoughts as I looked at this painting: it was smaller than I expected; it was more detailed and intricate than it appeared online; it was shinier than I’d thought it would be; and also, the colours had much more impact in real life and gave the painting much more depth than I had felt from viewing it online.

Scenes from the Passion 2003

Scenes from the Passion 2003

I spent a lot of time peering closely at the painting, in awe of it (and rather jealous that it wasn’t mine). However, it was the colour of the sky that struck me the most as interesting. The sky in this painting had been painted the colour of weak, milky coffee. It was smooth and deep. In isolation, it was an odd colour to choose for the sky. But as a whole image it worked. To me it said mid-autumn, late afternoon, bitter, cold, blanket of clouds, 1980s, PE, hockey field, mud, cold, hormones, boredom, and breath. I found it hard to stop staring at the painting.

That evening I read my youngest son The Way Back Home by Oliver Jeffers as his bedtime story. I’ve read this book many times before. Oliver Jeffers is a favourite in our family. We love his books. We love his simple, witty prose and his flat yet atmospheric illustrations. However, on reading this book on that particular evening I noticed for the first time the sky on each page. What I suddenly saw was the amount of different pigments Oliver Jeffers has used in just this one book to depict the sky. The colour scheme he has used goes as follows: light green, blue, white, light blue, purple, dark blue, white, dark blue, black, grey, white, bluey-black, mid-blue, blue, black, yellow, orange, purple, grey, black.

How often do you see a purple sky?

How often do you see a purple sky?

How was it that I had not noticed this before? Nor had my son or my husband spotted this either. I suspect that sky colour had been on my brain after my earlier response to the George Shaw painting. The trick Jeffers employs in The Way Back Home is, ironically and cleverly, to blind the reader with colour change to render the sky simply ‘there’. Now I see the drastic colour scheme, it is all I see when I read that book. However, it still works. I see that he uses this illusion in his other books as well.

A grey sky without clouds?

A grey sky without clouds?

The talent both these artists have is to make the colour for the sky, which in isolation might seem quirky or bizarre, appear in a composition as completely natural.

I think that this ability to align atmosphere with colour is one of many potential marks of a clever creative mind. I love colour. I aspire to have that ability.

The next time my children ask me: why is the sky blue? I will ask them a question in answer: is it?

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Why all artists should drink coffee

I’ve always suspected that coffee fired my imagination. Today I found out that science and history backs up my suspicions.

History has it that coffee was discovered in Ethiopia over a thousand years ago by a poetic goat-herder called Kaldi who noticed that his goats would dance and make merriment after nibbling on the leaves of a certain plant. He wanted some of what they were having so he took the beans of the plant to a nearby monastery. The monks there threw the beans on the fire in horror. Those ‘roasted’ beans were later ground and added to hot water which resulted in the first ever expresso. What a happy accident.

I spend a lot of time in arty cafes

I spend a lot of time in arty cafes

Science tells us that drinking coffee improves spatial awareness, cognition, memory and reactivity. So driving or operating heavy machinery after coffee is a good idea. So is thinking and imagining. As Balzac said ‘This coffee falls into your stomach, and immediately there is a general commotion. Ideas begin to move like battalions in the Grand Army.’ That is exactly what coffee does for me. I often find that after a good cup of coffee in one of Shrewsbury’s many cafes I want to cycle home at high speed with the wind in my hair to draw, paint, write, think, sketch or plan.

Balzac and his ghost dancing cat - too much coffee?

Balzac and his ghost dancing cat – too much coffee?

One of my favourite authors, Marcel Proust, loved his cup of coffee. He was extremely fussy in how he took it. If it wasn’t just so he’d declare: ‘This coffee is revolting!’

I said I wanted coffee, not a cat!

I said I wanted coffee, not a cat!

Coffee is the tipple of choice of many other arty people from the past. Søren Kierkegaard would drink his in one big gulp. Voltaire drank between 40 and 50 cups a day, which he mixed with chocolate. Johann Sebastian Bach wrote the Coffee Cantata, a moral treatise on the place of coffee in daily life.

So I sing, and raise my mug, to the Ethiopian goats for discovering the nectar of the creatives. Art without coffee? Is that possible, or just more difficult.

References

Coffee Makers ‘Top 10 Famous Coffee Drinkers from the History Books. Available from: http://coffeemakersusa.com/famous-coffee-drinkers-in-history/ [last accessed 12 July 2015]

Foley, M. 2012 Embracing the Ordinary Simon & Schuster UK, London

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The little people have landed

Today, while reading Embracing the Ordinary by Michael Foley (which is brilliant, by the way) I stumbled across ‘street artist’ Slinkachu.

A most brilliant book

A most brilliant book

I’m surprised that I haven’t seen this person’s work before because it is quirky, original, and fun and very ‘me’ if I may say that.

Slinkachu is a cross between a yarn bomber and the child in a grown up body. He (I’m assuming he is male) places his little scenes made up of ordinary urban objects and model people (usually purchased for Hornby train sets) around London, photographs them and leaves them to fate, human intervention and nature.

The people he uses cost about £2 each and are then painted and positioned. Each scene contains an implied narrative – a lady relaxing on a swing, a skier speeding down the slopes, a business presentation, or a tussle over money outside the Bank of England.

Is that a £10 on the floor?

Is that a £10 on the floor?

The tug-of-war of money

The tug-of-war of money

The scenes are set using everyday objects: litter, bollards, corners of walls, puddles, weeds, and holes.

I like the unobtrusiveness of this art and also the fact that it has the capacity to reach everyone. It is art outside of the gallery. The viewer doesn’t actively pursue the art, they fall upon it (or pass by it). There are no restrictions and there is no frame. This sort of art is hidden (in this sense by scale) and is only visible to the observant amongst us (i.e. those that are not blind to the ordinary).

Can you see her?

Can you see her?

He began creating his unique style of installation art in 2006 and is still at it in 2015.

Noooo, don't let go

Noooo, don’t let go

 

References

‘Tiny art: Slinkachu makes his miniature street scenes’ 10 October 2015 The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/oct/10/tiny-art-miniature-street-scenes-slinkachu [last accessed 12 July 2015]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Are all artists existentialists at heart?

Existentialism is a philosophical idea which is centered on the idea of the individual as a disorientated and confused being in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd world. When experiencing an existential dilemma, one feels alone in the world: misunderstood by all that surrounds and misunderstanding of all that surrounds.

Even a trusty sat nav would not help an existentialist

Even a trusty sat nav would not help an existentialist

Thinking about existentialism recently, as one does, it occurred to me that perhaps all active artists (and indeed anyone who feels the urge to be creative) are existentialists. They are all searching for a meaning and this search manifests itself in creative output. They are driven by emptiness.

The existentialist discovers the absurd about the world and to try to understand it, they want to show it to the rest of the world, to recreate it or somehow try to pin it down. The artist feels a overwhelming urge to express and understand the absurd.Creativity is central to existentialism. Rollo May defined creativity as ‘the process of bringing something new into being.’ We (that is all people not just artists) are constantly searching for authenticity. We feel off balance and we are looking for balance. Perhaps some of us find it. The creative person is always searching for that balance and never finds it. That is how I feel.

This is what my brain looks like, even when asleep

This is what my brain looks like, even when asleep

When I think of the stereotypical existentialist artist, I think of Francis Bacon. Gilles Deleuze saw painting as a manifestation of ‘hysteria’ Bacon’s art lies somewhere between straightforward mimicking of life and abstract. There is something of the unreality about his art, and the viewer feels an anxiety upon seeing his painting. Existentialism is all about anxiety. The existentialist is the anxious person.

Paul Tillich asserts that ‘most creative art, literature and philosophy in the twentieth century is in its very essence existentialist.’ I would assert that most art, literature and philosophy throughout history is in its very essence existentialist.

Gilles Deleuze - a man who thought a lot

Gilles Deleuze – a man who thought a lot

Another very obvious existential artist is Vincent Van Gogh. I’d also place the likes of Lucian Freud, George Shaw and Edward Hopper in the category of ‘obvious existentialists’. There are more.

One of my favourite existentialist artists - Edward Hopper - can't you just feel the weight of alienation here?

One of my favourite existentialist artists – Edward Hopper – can’t you just feel the weight of alienation here?

I am sure that I am one too. I haven’t yet found balance. Some would argue that that balance is God, but that is another blog entry.

References

Henry, N., 13 December 2010,’Fine art and existentialism’. Available from: http://www.slideshare.net/nancyahenry/fine-art-and-existentialism [last accessed 2 July 2015]

Wikipedia on Existentialism. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism [last accessed 2 July 2015]

 

 

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Depth vs Diversity

What makes for a better artist? Is it someone who finds their style early on and studies and explores one area in considerable depth throughout their career or is it someone who experiments, reinvents, diversifies, moves, travels and tries different things?

Grayson Perry - the modern day epitome of the diversifying artist

Grayson Perry – the modern day epitome of the diversifying artist

Does the former construct an intellectual type of art and the latter a superficial, temporary, art? Perhaps the former breeds boredom, staidness, and the latter creativity and originality. I wonder if the latter would eventually lead to the former, or even, if they follow each other in waves throughout a lifetime.

The end of the era of specialisation

The end of the era of specialization

I don’t know the answer, if there is even a black-and-white answer.

Artists prior to the current and last two centuries at least tended to stick to what they knew they were good at. Painters prior to the 19th century generally were painters and sculptures were sculptures. When I was the in-house editor for the Oxford Dictionary of the Renaissance (those words on Amazon describing this book, are mine), I was tasked the job of constructing a thematic index of entries. I found it quite easy to place people in the various categories of ‘painters’, ‘writers’, ‘sculptures’, and ‘philosophers’. There was some degree of overlap but not a huge amount. In fact, the Renaissance was probably the era when the creative and the intellectual started to diversify. Nowadays, many artists would be much harder to classify. But is that necessarily a good thing? Isn’t it perhaps better to find your niche and specialise and delve and dive into the pool of What You Know?

The artists were all listed here - there were a lot of them

The artists were all listed here – there were a lot of them

It would be arrogant of me to suppose that I have found my pool already. I don’t think I have, but will I get to such a stage? Perhaps after I graduate. What if I continue to study? Will I then find my niche after I put my pen down for the last time? Or will that never happen? I was stuck in a well of exclusive oil painting for many years from A levels to more recently when I started at college. I put that inertia down to my lack of inclination to diversify and experiment and the lack of encouragement to do so (something that comes from learning). I think I am a believer in the wave theory.

I’ve just started a mini-project: paint a portrait. I haven’t changed my style from my last project. Even the subject matter isn’t vastly different (First World War objects to the objects that define a personality).

The first of four sections of a portrait painting

The first of four sections of a portrait painting

However, I’m happy with the result. It isn’t a conventional way to do a portrait and that is my aim. But I feel the need for some further thought about how to improve on this style platform I have reached. I want to travel further, to boldly go and all that.

Just like Captain Kirk, I want to explore space

Just like Captain Kirk, I want to explore space

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Do objects have to be tangible to be loved?

I’m obsessed with objects and things (which, incidentally, aren’t the same – an object is specific and a thing is transient). Most of my art centres around objects and what they do for us and the ‘thingyness of things’ so my thinking antenna are always switched on to discussions on objects.

Yesterday I was browsing the internet looking for ideas for a topic for my dissertation which I will be writing in my next year at Wolverhampton University where I am hoping to top-up my foundation degree to full BA (Hons) in Fine Art. During my browsing I cam across an article in Science Daily which contemplates a topic related to the question in the title of this blog entry: virtual possessions have powerful hold on teenagers, researchers say. Reading this article brought me to thinks conclusion: virtual possessions have a powerful hold on all of us whatever our age.

These virtual possessions include: Facebook conversations, Instagram photographs, tweets, emails, websites, blogs, wish lists on Amazon and any piece of virtual information we decide we need to keep.

My best friends live here

My best friends live here

The article argues that virtual objects might in fact have a stronger pull, so not just an equal pull, on people’s emotions than solid objects.

If I had to list my most treasured possessions, I am sure I’d include my laptop in that list. I spend a huge amount of my time with my laptop. It comes with me on train journeys, I take it on holiday and I couldn’t get through a Sunday without it (never mind a week day). It is my portal onto the virtual world of knowledge, images, photographs, friendships, news, information and laughter. It is my library, my reference shelf and my entertainment. It also pays the bills (most of my work is carried out on my laptop).

If my laptop were purple I might treasure it more

If my laptop were purple I might treasure it more

Is it the physical laptop that I love? I don’t think so. It is all the delights that it allows me access to. The physicality of the keyboard and screen is irrelevant. They are the means to the objects that I treasure: the photographs, the emails and the tweets.

In some ways, this idea goes against everything I have recently come to believe about how we relate to our objects and the objects of others: through touch and feel. For my last project at college I wrote and thought deeply about how I needed to touch the First World War objects rather than just look at them to get an insight into the ‘trace’ of the original owners and current owners. So how can I feel so connected to my emails if I can’t touch them?

I’m not sure what the answer is here. I often worry that the photographs and conversations on Facebook will be lost and I won’t have the opportunity to look back and reflect when that urge takes me at some point in the future. I’ve been on Facebook for a few years now and I haven’t yet felt the urge to rehash conversations. I do, however, occasionally browse my photographs and reminisce. This leads me to thinking that the Facebook conversations are just that, conversations and they mirror real conversations had with friends, and it is the photographs and emails that are the possessions I want to keep (I have 30,000 messages in my inbox).

The virtual possessions that I want to keep are those that I could turn into physical possessions if I wanted to: emails and photographs. I don’t want to turn those that mirror conversations had in the real world into physical possessions. Perhaps that is where the key to this issue lies. It is only the possessions that have some sense of physicality that we treasure.

Yet, until we print them, we still can’t touch them.

 

References

Carnegie Mellon University, 2011, ‘Virtual possessions have powerful hold on teenagers, researches say’. Reprinted in Science Daily 10 May. Available from: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110509113729.htm [last accessed 21 June 2015]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘It is the artist temperament’

Today I had my grades and feedback for my final project as a student on the foundation degree at SCAT. I spent last night having the most weird and wonderful dreams. In my sleep, I received my feedback in my old university from one of the teachers I worked with in Japan. I woke up feeling as if I had hardly slept. My brain had not wanted to forget today.

Champagne on a school night...

Champagne on a school night…

However, today turned out to be good and the feedback was such that it made me smile, a lot. I did better than I expected. Since this morning, I’ve been walking around on that cloud we call nine, which is a lovely feeling. I think everyone should have days like this.

What I have been sitting on today

What I have been sitting on today

Annoyingly,  by tea time I found the cloud dissipating a little and I started to feel that familiar sense of doubt: what if they are wrong? What if they marked too high? Don’t they know how often I felt sick to the stomach with worry about this project? Do they realise how many tears I shed and how often I said ‘I want to give up!’? Don’t they know how so much of the success of this project was based on luck?

This evening I told my husband about my doubts and negative feelings. His rather quick reply: ‘Isn’t that what they call the artist temperament?’

Despite his instant response, I think he’s made a very valid point. I think that however well I do with my art studies, with the next stage (the top-up to a BA) and with anything else after that (who knows – the world?) I will drag myself along to each graduation day full of self-doubt, a grumpy tummy, and the odd ‘I want to give up’, ‘I can’t do this’, ‘this is too hard’.

I think I am cursed with the artist temperament and I am destined to be like this for the rest of my life.

The ultimate self-doubting artist with a temperament issue

The ultimate self-doubting artist with a temperament issue

How do I feel about this? I can’t imagine being any other way. Doubt fuels my creativity.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Turner Prize 2015 – fur coats on chairs?

I’ve been meaning to write about the nominees for this year’s Turner Prize for a few weeks now and today I have the chance to do so (now it is a couple of weeks since I finished my foundation degree final project).

I’m intrigued by this year’s nominees: there are no video pieces (my new favourite medium), no drawings or paintings (my main medium) and one of the nominees is a not a person, but a lot of people. I’m excited by the idea that a collective has been nominated. They are my personal favourite for the first prize.

This ‘collective’ is called ‘Assemble’. They are a London-based art collective of individuals who work in art, design and architecture. There are 18 members of the collective and they started working together in 2010. Their aim is to engage the public in their art and achieve a greater harmony and relationship between people and place.

An example of their work and one that appeals to me, is ‘Big Slide’ which was literally, a big slide. It was constructed as a temporary structure. On the one side was a slide, on the other, large steps that also functioned as seating.

A play area for all - people just love to climb

A play area for all – people just love to climb

What appeals to me about Assemble is the diversity of the artwork and the anonymity of it. They produce art for art’s sake and for the sake of the public. That is what real art should be about. They just want to improve and enrich lives. That’s all. Full stop.

Another nominee this year is Bonnie Camplin. She has been nominated for her work ‘Military Industrial Complex’ which is a living work that takes the form of a study room exploring what ‘consensus reality’ is and what form it takes. Drawing from physics to philosophy, psychology, witchcraft, quantum theory and warfare, this work examines the anxieties caused by the categorisation of lived experiences as valid or invalid. The idea is to question the locus of madness. Camplin’s practice lies somewhere in the broad spectrum of performance art. But her work also encompasses writing, drawing and film.

The Military Industrial Complex

The Military Industrial Complex

Janice Kerbel has been nominated for her operative work ‘Doug’ which is a musical composition for a single voice that chronicles a continuous stream of nine catastrophic events endured by a single individual. Kerbel is known for work which blends reality and imagination. My question here is: is this art, or is it music/narration? Can this be classed as art? I think it can. This is my second favourite choice to win.

The last nominee is Nicole Wermers (who is the same age as me so I still have time for the Turner Prize). Wermers’s work uses the media of collage and sculpture to explore consumer culture. For the Turner Prize, she has been nominated for her work Infrastruktur which explores modern aesthetics, fashion and class.

Fur coats and chairs

Fur coats and chairs

I have seven years left. Perhaps next year I’ll be writing a blog about my own nomination. I can but hope.

 

References

BBC News website 12 May 2015 ‘Turner Prize 2015: Shortlist includes Toxteth housing estate’, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-32706928 [last accessed 1 June 2015]

Assemble’s website http://assemblestudio.co.uk/ [last accessed 1 June 2015]

Bonnie Camplin on South London Gallery’s website http://www.southlondongallery.org/page/bonnie-camplin [last accessed 1 June 12015]

The Common Guild website http://www.thecommonguild.org.uk/2014/03/janice-kerbel-doug/ [last accessed 1 June 2015]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

For artist, read ethnographer

Now that I have finished my foundation degree I find myself wallowing in a void of directionless thinking while I wait for my ‘top-up’ at Wolverhampton to start in the autumn.

That's my life at the moment

That’s my life at the moment

Actually, that’s not strictly true. I have the History Makers video project to do and I have started working on this including working on a few experiments such as old hand gives young hand a poppy and names and objects. It seems, I can’t sit still.

I lasted four days before I started an ‘interim reflective journal’ recording my thoughts and notes on readings. If I have learnt one thing from my foundation degree (in fact I’ve learnt a lot) then I’ve learnt the joy of reflecting and writing.

I’m currently reading a fascinating book by an author I was introduced to during the Contextual Studies tutorials at college: Stuff by Daniel Miller. Daniel Miller is an anthropologist, not an artist. The book is about anthropology, or perhaps more accurately, ethnography, it is not even remotely about art. I needed to start a new ‘reflective journal’ to make notes from this book. The main topic of this book is ‘stuff’ and it contains a number of lengthy essays on ‘stuff’ and what ‘stuff’ is, why we need it and how we relate to it. This is a very ‘me’ book. I am fascinated with ‘stuff’. By stuff I mean both the tangible and intangible objects in our lives.

Daniel Miller - the man who studies things

Daniel Miller – the man who studies things

Why, as an artist, am I finding a book about ethnography so fascinating? I think this is because many artists (especially in this century) are quasi-ethnographers (I can’t possibly claim we are fully-fledged ethnographers). We study people and culture. We wish we were brave enough to ask the things that real ethnographers can ask. We wish we had the academic kudos to delve deep into the lives of people. Many artists are able to do this (and I hope I have been able to, to a limited degree, with my most recent projects). There has even been academic discussion about the ‘ethnographic turn’ in art since the 1960s. In fact, I feel a strange sense of deja vu.

Art is a discipline that crosses into others, and for me that is social science (perhaps for other artists it crosses into other disciplines).

My unputadownable book

My unputadownable book

I’ve always been interested in people and this has been reflected in my reading matter of the past. I feel quite a lot of joy now that I can connect that interest with my other pleasure in life: art.

A classic: one of my favourite books

A classic: one of my favourite books – a book of vignettes of people who run lighthouses

I don’t know what direction my art is going to take next but I hope it stays with people and their quirks. This may not be a new phenomena in art but its one that I am happy to be a part of.

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

My last post as a SCAT student, but not the last post

This will probably be my last post as a student at SCAT, but it certainly won’t be my last post on this blog.

I started this blog during my first few weeks at SCAT, it’s primary objective was to be my ‘reflective journal’ for the Contextual Studies module in the first year. This was the art history module for which each week my two fellow students and I were assigned short tasks such as ‘research some isms’, ‘define modernism‘, ‘find out about a decade’, or ‘consider people who collect things’. The reflective journal / blog evolved into a blog to illustrate art and arty topics of interest to me, things I stumbled across day to day. The original concept changed. I didn’t just use it for homework; it eventually evolved into my art website. I even added examples from my body of work and it became more than a blog. This blog also became a catalyst for other related blogs, one about the Powis Castle project from my second year, another about random thoughts that bother me in strange places, and one for my final project.

So it now includes random discussions on art history that strike me as worth sharing. I’ve discussed Classical sculpture, cognitive susceptibility, Chiaroscuro, and other art-related issues here. I’ve looked at concepts such as spatial relationships, illusion, abstraction and allegory.

I had a preconception of how the form a blog should take before I started this blog. And I hope that this one, has changed my perspective. I’m paraphrasing here, in reality, it is just a blog about things I like to talk about so the form it takes evolves into whatever I want it to be.

Since embarking on the Foundation Degree, as well as starting this blog, I’ve become more experimental with my art, including a short-lived attempt at collage. I’ve learnt how to set up an installation in an exhibition. I’ve had to consider the formal elements, construction, the foreground and composition in my art. I’ve discovered the importance of how to juxtapose different elements for great effect. I’ve  I’ve used many a new medium, such as video, photography and printing. My exploration has taken me on a tough but rewarding journey. I’ve been taught the value of metaphor in the messages I want to get across.

But most importantly, I have become interested in the narrative of objects, the dialogue of the people who own or come into contact with objects. This was a new thing for me, and it is thanks to my work while on the Foundation Degree that I have found this interest.

One of the best complements I had at my final exhibition for this course was: ‘I love the symbolism‘. I’m under no illusion, though, I have a lot still to learn. Fashion for art is ephemeral, what is interesting now, might not be so in five years time. So much is influenced by the political.

Art can appear opaque, I aim to produce art that is not so. On the other hand, I don’t want it to be too transparent. It should provoke thought in the viewers. It should allow them to question their assumptions.

Simultaneously, I would like to continue to enjoy the process of art making. I don’t want to base my ideas on empirical evidence alone, I’m interested in the symmetrical influence of evidence and insight. I think it is getting the balance right that is the key.

To end, I confess, for this last blog entry as a SCAT student I set myself a challenge. I wanted to see if I could write a blog containing all the words on a list of ‘arty’ terms supplied by one of the tutors last week. I hope I have succeeded. If so, does this mean that I can now say that I am able to talk ‘arty farty bollocks’ with confidence? And if so, then the Foundation Degree has been a great success for me.

Joking aside, as a lover of words, I have enjoyed this challenge. Onwards and upwards for me and this blog so please stay with me on this journey.

The arty list - page 1

The arty list – page 1

The arty list - page 2

The arty list – page 2

 

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment