More on interesting art…

I realised last night that I was using two words interchangeably to describe the sort of art that I think sells: ‘interesting’ and ‘pretty’.

Georgia O'Keefe liked to paint pretty art

Georgia O’Keefe liked to paint pretty art – with a sense of abstraction

I think there is an important difference between the two which I now need to make. The adjective ‘interesting’ is what I want my art to be described as, not ‘pretty’. I am not against pretty art. It is just that I’m not good at creating pretty art. However, I would very much like to create interesting art.

Many a Monet adorned the walls of the middle classes in the 1980s

Many a Monet adorned the walls of the middle classes in the 1980s

However, there is still a lot of pessimism in what I am thinking here. My impression from what I’ve learnt about art history and contemporary art in the last 12 months or so is that to be appreciated for creating interesting art, and ultimately to make money from interesting art, you need to be known. I could produce what might be regarded as ‘interesting’ art yet chances are it will pass people by unnoticed and unwanted. If you are unknown, you can still make a living out of pretty art. People will stop and look and coo as they pass you by. But if you are unknown it is almost impossible to make a living out of interesting art.

Fish and chips - interesting? But would you want it on your wall?

Fish and chips – interesting? But would you want it on your wall?

I debated this issue last night with someone who likes to provoke an argument and he asked me: who do you want to please? Do you want to please the masses or a certain sector of society? Who are you aiming your art at? All good questions. My answer was that I would like to appeal to the masses rather than a ‘certain sector’. I want anybody who sees my art to stop and think. I want them to like it for what it is, not for who made it. I want to give them something to ponder. I want them to go away and notice the odd and unusual in their world and see things they previously haven’t noticed (through Proustian eyes). I hope this is a good aim to have. I’m never going to be able to make a living out of it though but I guess that is ok so long as I’ve made someone think, and I will always have my day job to fall back on.

This chap again, or at least his eyes

This chap again, or at least I only need his eyes

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Does good art have to be interesting?

At Zumba today, as usual while jumping around like a mad person, my mind started to wonder and ponder, this time the topic that came to mind was: does good art have to be interesting? I was thinking specifically about video art and the sort of video art that is recorded in real time with not much going on.

I'm there somewhere...

I’m there somewhere…

A while ago, when I was experimenting with time-lapse videos and creating ‘days in the life’ of various rooms in my house one of my tutors at college asked me: yes, but, is it interesting? I didn’t have much to say in response. The answer  is: actually, no, not hugely. However, it made a statement. It had a point. There was a message (about how the brain fits together stills to make a narrative). It said something. It was important. But was it interesting? Is importance enough? I’m not sure ordinary artists such as me can get away with importance without interest.

Is a video of David Beckham taking a nap engaging?

Is a video of David Beckham taking a nap engaging?

I find it quite disheartening that when I post a picture on facebook that I think is clever, quirky or unusual I get fewer comments and ‘likes’ than if I post what I would call a ‘pretty’ picture of a landscape or a cute child or a pet. Grayson Perry in his recent Reith Lectures talked about ‘pretty’ art being what most people want. If that is true, I worry about whether I will ever be able to make a living out of art. I don’t think so. I’m not good at pretty art. I don’t enjoy pretty art (in fact I find it quite stressful to try to be pretty).

CM Dogs

A friend’s two very cute dogs

Once a month on a Wednesday, I have been going to a meeting of arty people called ‘art squad’ at the Shrewbury Coffeehouse. During these meetings we get creative, exhibit work based on a theme, and drink coffee (or beer) and chat about arty things. At the start of the meeting people are given the chance to announce forthcoming exhibitions or plug themselves as an artist or creator of some sort. At the last meeting a lady stood up to announce a forthcoming event and passed around postcards advertising her practice which is portraits. Her work was incredible, absolutely stunning, but I don’t think I could do anything like it. I don’t think I could paint living things to commission for a living (and I certainly wouldn’t entertain the notion that I have the talent to do this). I don’t think I have a saleable style. I’ve talked here before about the fact that I can’t see myself as a street portrait artist either (due to lack of skill and lack of motivation).

So what will happen to me when I finish college? I suspect I will continue to fill the house with hundreds of paintings of my feet, my boots, ketchup bottles, my children’s favourite toys and abandoned flip flops.

A pair of flip flops - acrylic and pen on cotton - pretty enough?

A pair of flip flops – acrylic and pen on cotton – pretty enough?

Is that enough?

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Grayson Perry and the bus from Helsinki

I highly recommend anyone who has one or two feet in the art world taking some time out to listen to Grayson Perry’s recent Reith Lectures which can be found on BBC iPlayer. He speaks a lot of sense in these lectures. Here he talks generally about art and his thoughts on the current art scene in a very down-to-earth and humorous way.

Grayson Perry speaking sense

Grayson Perry speaking sense

There are so many interesting and poignant points he makes in all of the four lectures that have an impression on me, too many for me to mention them all here. However, the most insightful points for me came from his last lecture ‘I Found Myself in the Art World’. This lecture is about how Grayson himself came to art. He  also gives advice on others coming to art. Here, two of his points resonated with me.

Firstly, he talks about the Helsinki Bus Station Theory which was coined by Finnish photographer, Arno Minkkinen. The theory runs thus. You are an artist, metaphorically, stuck in Helsinki. You are at the bus station and you have just left art college and you need to go somewhere. There are about twenty buses to choose from. You catch one. You travel for a few stops and get off. At that point you show your work to someone in the art world and they say ‘oh that’s nice, reminds me so much of <famous artist>’. This riles you so you return to the bus station and get on another bus. You travel on this bus for another twenty stops and get off. Here you meet another art critic who responds with, ‘your work is great, you must have been influenced by <famous artist different from the first>’. So you go back again to the bus station and continue. The moral of the story? You should have stayed on the first bus. The message Grayson Perry is giving here is that it is not a bad thing to be compared to someone else or to be influenced by other artists. There is no such thing as true originality so why fight it? Stick with your gut feelings and stay true to your own personal style.

Which bus to catch? Hmm.

Which bus to catch? Hmm.

The second point he makes that stays with me is a point he makes with reference to Proust. He cites an argument made by Alaine de Botton in his book How Proust Will Change Your Life, which I read a few years’ ago being a huge de Botton fan (in fact I’ve just noticed he has a new book). In it de Botton talks about people who make pilgrimage to France looking for Proust’s fictional village of Combray in an effort to have the Proustian experience. In trying to look at Proust’s world through their own eyes, they are missing the point of Proust entirely. Rather, all they need to do is stay at home and look at their world through Proust’s eyes. This is something which I try to do in my art and research. Proust studied the minutiae and ordinary around him and he emphasized the art of examining the stuff of our lives. People are all about what they seem, rather than what they are. Things are all about how we feel about them, not what they are. He linked our feelings with our memories of things. He was all about interpretation and analysis of things. He is very relevant to the world now.

What is this man thinking about?

What is this man thinking about?

In conclusion, I hope to stay on that first bus and I will be on that bus looking through the window at the world with Proustian eyes. I don’t want to be tempted to hop off and go back. Let me have the courage to do that.

 

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Statistics as art

Art from unlikely sources interests me. I like the idea that art that doesn’t have to come from creativity, emotions, spontaneity, and original thinking but from human order, patterns and human habit. Fractals, for example, are so ordered and deliberately mapped yet so very beautiful. The oldest art forms are from nature and there is nothing more ordered than nature.

Art in the form of my favourite vegetable

Art in the form of my favourite vegetable

I recently came across the notion of the infographic. These are basically visual representations of statistics. It does seem to be possible to create art out of statistics, such as Eric Fischer’s analysis of the tweets of New York City. The result is quite beautiful.

Most tweets happen in Manhattan

Most tweets happen in Manhattan

Also Evan Roth‘s ‘Multi-Touch Paintings’ which are created by the smudged finger marks made by people using hand-held devices.

Beautiful smudges

Beautiful smudges

Someone, I don’t know who, they apparently want to remain anonymous, has generated images created from squashed movies. Each frame of the movie is stretched tall and thin to create this single image from an entire movie.

There is no spoon in this picture

There is no spoon in this picture

During my research for this topic, I was introduced to David McCandless‘s book Information is Beautiful. David describes himself on his website as a data journalist and information designer. His passion isn’t so much turning data into art, but rather presenting data in a visual way so that it has appeal and can be more-easily interpreted than a table of figures. However, a by-product of this I think is that he is a sort of artist. He might not be creating something with the final result in mind, but the results are art nonetheless. I find his book utterly compelling.

One of my favourites - how different cultures associate colours with emotions

One of my favourites – how different cultures associate colours with emotions

Conceptual artist Katie Lewis has been recently collecting and charting data relating to her body to create works that appear quite random but are actually extremely controlled and pre-defined. Interestingly, she shares with me an interest in using art to chronicle the passage of time, or ‘presence and absence, chaos and order, control and loss of control’ (katiehollandlewis.com/statement). So she is using a scientific method to create something that looks creative and spontaneous. There is something calming about these ‘chaotic’ works. It shouldn’t make sense but it does somehow.

Presence and Absence - coincidentally what my current project at college is all about

Presence and Absence – coincidentally what my current project at college is all about

Love also the idea of synthesizing words and probability to create art as in the Jeff Noon word tree here created by another fan of data and image. The result is poetic as well as artistic.

I think the idea of data as art needs some further thought, it is a paradox that has lots of legs, especially in this post-modern data driven world in which we seem to have found ourselves.

References

Kuo, A. (2013) ‘Drawing with Data’ Modern Painters October

Katie Lewis’ website, http://katiehollandlewis.com/ [last accessed 5 November 2013]

Krum, R. (2011) Moviebarcodes: Whole Movies in a Single Glance http://www.coolinfographics.com/blog/tag/art [last accessed 4 November 2013]

McCandless, D. Information is Beautiful 2009 (HarperCollins, London)

Rev Dan Catt’s blog http://revdancatt.com/2013/03/13/notes-on-remixing-noon-generative-text-and-markov-chains/ [last accessed 5 November 2013]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Art for sale for ordinary people

My favourite story of the week this week is the one about Banksy putting up a selection of his canvases for sale on a market stall in New York for the day. The best bit of the story? Hardly anyone bought any of the canvasses (just three people) and one woman even haggled over the price and got herself a real bargain.

By one get one free

By one get one free

I think this is a very powerful stunt and illustrates some interesting truths about the art world and human nature. Firstly, people have expectations about the quality of artworks sold on a market stall. They expect them to be mass-produced, amateur and cheap. They expect them to be of little real value and certainly not original in any way. And it seems they don’t expect them to be even worth much of a look (since only three people actually bothered). Secondly, the public is heavily influenced by location and knowledge. If  these artworks had been for sale at auction or in a gallery, people would have been prepared to pay much higher prices. In addition, if the people who happened upon this market stall had known that the canvases were by an artist whose works have sold for thousands they would have snapped up the pieces without even a second thought for whether they actually liked them or not. But they did not know this, so most just walked past.

A banksyism found in New York

A banksyism found in New York

This of course was a stunt. Banksy is currently in New York acting as an official artist in residence. He has been making his presence known in New York in a number of amusing and clever ways.

 'The Sirens of the Lambs', a work by the has been moving through the meatpacking district of New York CIty.

‘The Sirens of the Lambs’, soft toys in a lorry that has been moving through the meatpacking district of New York.

With this one-day only market stall, Banksy was making a point about who validates art and values art and what makes one piece of artwork more valuable than another. Clearly a good point very well made. He was also emphasizing his firm belief that art should be available to the public and not an elite group of well-off people or people who visit art galleries. It is a rather sad irony that the public didn’t seem hugely interested in his art. I suspect that it was because they made the assumption that what they saw were cheap pieces of ‘familiar-looking street art’ or Banksy copies and therefore not worth spending money on.

References

‘British Graffiti artist causes a stir in New York’, BBC News website, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-24484453 [last accessed 16 October 2013]

Posted in Blog | Tagged | 1 Comment

What is it about motorways…

…that make me ponder man’s (and woman’s, cat’s and ferret’s) existentialist dilemma in the modern world? By the way, this entry isn’t directly about art  so don’t expect too many pretty pictures here (see below).

Are we nearly there yet?

Are we nearly there yet?

Recently I have been reading about existentialism on request from one of my tutors at college. He wants me to see how I can relate the ideas of existentialism to my artwork. I haven’t come to many conclusions yet except that many of my paintings appear quite lonely and isolated and existentialism is about man’s anxiety over feeling lonely and isolated in a world of interconnectedness.

On the M54

On the M54

Every time I have to drive anywhere, particularly by myself (actually always by myself), I find myself slowly at first, then rapidly, thinking and worrying about life, death, anxiety and alienation. At the end I am usually feeling quite melancholy and wondering what the point of it all is. Why is that? Perhaps it is because I have nobody to talk to. Perhaps it is the monotony of motorway driving. Perhaps it is boredom leading to melancholy leading to anxiety leading to a type of catastrophizing (How much further? Why am I here? What does it feel like to be dead? I could die here? Oh my god what is the point of living?). Then perhaps it is mostly because death could come very quickly and easily on a motorway; travelling up a long and lonely motorway, such as the M54, feels like travelling to your death. I wonder if you die on the motorway whether your brain carries on travelling up the motorway, at least until the lights finally switch off.

Gladys tells me where to go.

Gladys tells me where to go.

Motorways have been part of the British landscape for quite a few decades now, since the late 1950s. We now have (to name but a few) the M1, M6, M5, M42, M54, M25. They all have their own personalities (nobody likes the poor old downtrodden M6 and who could fail to love the M62?). They were a prominent feature of my childhood. We went on the motorway to get to Grandmas. We went on the motorway to go on holiday. We went on the motorway for a day trip to Birmingham. My dad used to wax lyrical about how revolutionary motorways were and how wonderful the spaghetti junction was (oh how I loved the idea of this edible concrete). I see motorways and I see my dad driving. A good cheap day out for him was a trip to Keel services to watch the cars going under the bridge (something my own children would perhaps secretly quite enjoy).

If you look carefully you can see my brother, sister and me looking down at the cars

If you look carefully you can see my brother, sister and me looking down at the cars

Their ubiquitous presence is embedded in our social and mental lives. Through them (and their little stop offs) we are confronted with popular culture (why do all services look identical?) and familiarity (those blue signs with ‘THE NORTH’ or ‘THE MIDLANDS’ that may as well read ‘THE TWILIGHT ZONE’). They support increasing traffic flows and seem to be in a constant state of being repaired (roadworks, roadworks, more roadworks) so are a constant source of our frustration. We have to live with them and we can’t live without them. We have a love-hate relationship with them. Nowadays we are obsessed with our sat-navs (mine is called  Gladys) who should take the stress out of some aspects of motorway driving (leaving us to contemplate death in more depth) but which actually send us slowly bonkers in our loneliness (such as in Jonathan Coe’s book about the man who ended up conversing freely and insanely with his sat nav).

Which way is up?

Which way is up?

Motorways are to me the epitome of the existential fragmentation that their three-lane road travel creates (and it has to be three-lane to be a proper motorway). The motorway journey is an inconvenience, its hours of the day spent in necessary boredom, a task so banal that we rarely consider it. This network makes us confront ourselves and acts as a metaphor for our life’s journey.

Do you want cheese on top of that?

Do you want cheese on top of that?

I despise motorways. But I also adore them. They are ordinary, they deserve greater contemplation. They remind me of the insignificance of my existence. They force me to evaluate and stop and stare for a while. Nothing else in my life does that so powerfully. They are excuse for an overpriced coffee and muffin.

That's not a coffee, that's a three-course meal

That’s not a coffee, that’s a three-course meal

Motorways have inspired creative output in many ways, they feature in songs (think Chris Rea ‘Driving Home for Christmas’) and books (the aforementioned Jonathan Coe’s The Terrible Privacy of Maxwell Slim, J. G. Ballard’s Concrete Island or the rather more obscure Edward Chell’s In the Company of Ghosts: The Poetics of the Motorway). I really want to paint a picture of what we see when we are driving down a motorway. It would have to be large. It’s on my to-do list.

Now for my next topic…ring roads.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Once up a time…with Damien Hirst

I find it fascinating that Damien Hirst is the author of a new children’s ABC book, imaginatively titled ‘ABC’.

An unlikely children’s author, Mr Hirst has compiled a A-Z book for children using his artworks as illustrative material, for example, D is for Diamonds (showing a picture of that infamous diamond-encrusted scull), L is for Lamb (with a picture of that lovely fluffy lamb in a vat of formaldehyde).

L is for Lamb

L is for Lamb

Other letters include: A for Anatomy, K for Kaleidoscope, and J for Jaws.

According to Damien Hist children are more likely to be fascinated by this than scared

According to Damien Hist children are more likely to be fascinated by this than scared

In addition, he has utilized his passion for typography in this book by putting letters in different typefaces: A is in Albertus, B is in Baskerville.

So, will such a venture encourage children to become interested in art? Will it appeal to all parents or just arty parents? Perhaps. I will certainly be buying a copy for my three-year old and can’t wait to see how he responds to it.

Cute cover

Cute cover

The Huffington Post arranged for a year six year old to review the book with some amusing results, including her opinion on W for Wings: “I didn’t like the angel. It is ugly and boring because she is just sitting on a rock.”

What will my own critical reader think?

What will my own critical reader think?

Let’s see what my critical, and very cute, little book reviewer thinks.

References

Rao, M. (2013), Damien Hirst’s Children’s Book, Reviewed By A Six-Year-Old Painter (PHOTOS). Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/04/damien-hirst-childrens-book-review_n_4039538.html?utm_hp_ref=books&ir=Books [last accessed 7 October 2013]

Marriot, H. (2013), Damien Hirst: ‘I felt the power of art from a very young age’. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/sep/29/damien-hirst-art-abc-picture-book-children [last accessed 7October 2013]

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged | 2 Comments

Real art going to school

I read a headline today on the BBC News website that read: ‘art masterpieces in schools’ and it immediately made me think ‘blog entry’.

A future Turner? My son already makes art and he's just 3

A future Turner? My son already makes art and he’s just 3

Between 1 and 18 October this year, primary and secondary schools across the UK will be visited by a number of famous works of art by the likes of L. S. Lowry, J. M. W. Turner and Claude Monet. The idea is to encourage children to become appreciators of fine art. The scheme has been organized by the BBC ‘Your Paintings’ (an organization aiming to make works of art accessible to the masses). Current artists will join the paintings on their visits to schools to lead workshops about art.

Let's talk about art

Let’s talk about art

I think this is a marvelous idea. I strongly believe that encouraging young people to appreciate art is a Good Thing. Being a bit arty myself I frequently try, and often fail, to engage my three children in art through visits to galleries and carefully placed copies of ‘Modern Painters’ in the toilet. I wish a Turner could visit their school. Perhaps if this project is successful it could be extended to other areas of the country, I suggest Shropshire stands first in the line.

shrophsire

This county needs more art

References

Public Catalogue Foundation ‘Masterpieces in Schools’, http://www.thepcf.org.uk/what_we_do/228 [last accessed 3 October 2013]

BBC News website ‘Art masterpieces in schools’, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-24333790 [last accessed 3 October 2013]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Long-distance art of the future

I’ve always wondered what it is about me that means that I can draw. I’m not saying I’m the best artist in the world, far from it, but I was always singled out at school as ‘one of the good drawers’ rather than ‘maths genius’ or ‘should audition for X-Factor’ (not that we had X-Factor in the 1970s).

These guys would have sent me packing

These guys would have sent me packing

Is it something present in my left hand? Is it something in my brain? Or in my eye? What gives me that ability? About a year ago I pondered whether if I started painting with my feet I would be able to develop a style to match that with which I have using my left hand. This would perhaps suggest that talent is in the brain or the eye, not in the instrument (the hand or foot).

Could I do this?

Could I do this?

Today, I read about an artist who has managed to draw in three separate cities with the help of robot technology.  This of course doesn’t actually add anything to the discussion of hand vs head vs eye as the robot is a replica to the hand rather than an alternative, but it is interesting nonetheless.

I wonder if I could get one of these on eBay?

I wonder if I could get one of these on eBay?

Yesterday, after a long period of research, Austrian artist, Alex Kiessling, made three drawings all at once. One with his own hand, and two with robot hands. Kiessling drew in Vienna, the robots in Berlin and London. He used an infra-red sensor to trace the movements of his pen and sent the signal via satellite to the two robots situated in Trafalgar Square and Breitscheidplatz. The project is called ‘Long Distance’ and the three works will be united together to create one big piece.

A work of art in the making, without the touch of a human hand

A work of art in the making, without the touch of a human hand

The question this experiment poses instead is: is the art work created by the robot as valuable as the art work created by the artist? If it is an exact replica, then surely it is, even though the artist is sitting in a different city and hasn’t touched the art work itself. Could we record art being created to be recreated at a different time and place? Could we one day teach a robot to paint or draw ‘in the style of’ to be used after the artist has long disappeared to the next world? Could artists use this technique to produce multiple copies of an art work for commissions?

I don’t think it is time for me to invest in a team of robots just yet. I want some new boots first.

To-die-for boots

To-die-for boots

 

References

Zolhfagharifard, E. ‘One artist, two robots, and three cities’, 27 Sept 2013, Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2433471/Artist-Alex-Kiesslings-Long-Distance-uses-robots-copy-painting.html [last accessed 27 September 2013]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Guardian are such copycats!

I’m not sure whether I should be flattered (unlikely) or whether it is a complete coincidence (likely) but the Guardian appear to have viciously copied my idea (which actually I borrowed (read as ‘stole’) from Rachel Hurdley‘s study of mantlepieces).

The idea of collecting a part of people’s personal space still interests me. After mantlepieces it was bedside tables, and more recently staircases. Here are a few I have collected (and then either drawn or painted).

Stairs Victoria

Ross Stairs

Lisa Stairs

Stairs Jane1

Stairs Kylie

Stairs challenge

What do staircases say about us? Not a lot it seems. I think they are the most ignored part of the house. We tend to paint them in magnolia, and carpet them in beige. We tend to leave the walls fairly blank and use them as a dumping ground for coats, shoes, bags, and other bits of our lives. We use them as a means, rather than an end. I feel we ought to spend more time thinking about our staircases. Let’s pay homage to staircases.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment