Cognitive susceptibility

Over the last week, I have been manning my final exhibition which is held jointly with fellow student, Bill Sample. My artwork consists of a series of paintings, clay work and a video based on the objects of the First World War. Bill is exhibiting various drawings and sculptures inspired by a collection of poems by Ted Hughes called ‘Crow‘. One of his pieces is a giant inflatable crow. In addition, his exhibition is complemented by a soundtrack of Ted Hughes reading out a selection of the poems from Crow. This soundtrack plays on repeat.

I have a copy of this book

I have a copy of this book

Over the week, this has had a profound effect on me. It has blackened my mood and sent me a tiny bit mad. At the start of a day when I am manning the exhibition I feel fine, by the end I feel deep, dark, gloom. I wonder whether I am perhaps cognitively susceptible to outside stimuli, perhaps more than other people. Would someone else in the same situation feel as affected as I do? Would they feel Ted Hughes in their bones calling out: ‘Where is, where is the black beast?’

So I have concluded that sitting in the exhibition space listening to Ted Hughes and staring at black things all day is not good for my mental health. Or perhaps, ironically, it is doing me some good because it has provoked a lot of thought and a desire to create more art.

The other effect of my few days manning the exhibition is that I have ‘befriended’ the giant inflatable crow which gently rises and falls throughout the day. In reality, he is just bin bags and air. But over the time I’ve been there, he has become my companion. He is a crow-man, a man-crow, a crow-crow. He has turned into a friend, a soulmate, an irritant and a foe. He rises and falls consistently and predictably throughout the day. I know exactly the point at which he reaches his peak and starts to fall. I know when he’s about to be roused from his slumber and start his ascent. The pattern does not change. He continues to rise and fall. I keep willing him to break the pattern, turn around, untie himself from his hairdryer and walk out of the exhibition. He never does this.

Surely these thoughts are a sign that I am (temporarily) losing my mind?

My new best friend

My new best friend

I wonder why I have felt the need to turn bin bags and air into a living thing? Is that a normal human trait or is that just me? He is a thing, but to me he’s become more than a thing. He has a face and a personality. He exists. He is amused at the visitors who come to the exhibition, as I am. We share our experiences, silently.

Bill’s artwork has affected me then in a good way: it has provoked thought and made me want to create (to draw crows). I have also developed a new interest in Ted Hughes and his poems.  So in that respect, his exhibition has been a big success.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

80% research, 20% art

I am now within spitting distance of finishing my foundation degree at SCAT. It feels quite peculiar to be here after nearly three years. Making art, and documenting my making of art, have been in my life for so long. I have a final exhibition in four days and I’m currently in the process of finalizing the arrangements for that. I’m fortunate in that I’m in a position in which all the art work has been completed. I’ve hopefully sufficiently planned for the hanging and displaying of the artwork. I think everything is ready. I need to buy ‘nibbles’ for the Private View and decide what to wear but those are the fun jobs. I’ve publicized the exhibition to the best of my abilities, including lots of  tweeting, facebooking, walking around Shrewsbury with posters and nagging friends to pass the word. So now I’m starting to reflect. I’ve made sure I have nails, a drill, a projector and a personal statement ready and now I can think back.

The poster

The poster

In my reflections on progress for this final assessment and the three years at SCAT which I’ve embarked on over the past few days, I have been reading back over my art journal since November. The one thing that struck me more than anything else is how much time and effort I have spent researching for this final project and how relatively little time I have spent drawing, painting, videoing and taking photographs, or, in other words, making art. So much of my journal is about reading, more reading, snippets from magazine articles, sentences from book chapters, odd quotes, odd thoughts, planning, thinking; the maybes and ifs. Not much of my journal is about drawing.

My reflective journal

My reflective journal

So is this what I, if I am to become a real artist, am destined to do? Am I destined to become an experimenter, inventor and researcher first and foremost and someone who draws second?

This is not a depressing thought. I like thinking and writing. I like researching. I enjoy brain storming and coming up with ideas. I fear that the ideas will not come but I enjoy the process of letting them come. They usually do come. Of course I enjoy painting, videoing and drawing too but I love the fact that now, by the time I get to this point, I’ve spent a long time mentally planning. Before I started my course at SCAT, I just painted things that interested me. Now, I plan, read, think, delve, sit in cafes and make notes.

This gets my creative juices flowing

This gets my creative juices flowing

I’ll never go back.

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I want that job

Today I read about an artist who has been employed as the official artist on the 2015 general election campaign. I want that job. It seems that he spends his days following David Cameron and Nick Clegg, at the same time sketching people. I love to sketch people. He trails the campaign trail with his sketch pad and pencil. Once the election has been and gone, he will create a piece of artwork inspired by these experiences to be displayed at Westminster.

Reading up about Adam Dant, who I hadn’t heard of before, I find out he won the Jerwood Drawing Prize in 2002. He is well known for pen-and-ink drawings which narrate aspects of British culture and political life.

Soerditch: Diary of a Neighbourhood, 2013

Soerditch: Diary of a Neighbourhood, 2013

After I’ve won the Jerwood Drawing Prize perhaps I will get picked for the job. The next election will be in 2020 so I have time.

References:

‘Artist Adam Dant: Drawing the election campaign’ BBC News, 22 April 2014. Available from:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32384325 [last accessed 22 April 2014]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

I wish you’d just paint pretty things…

This is something my mum used to say to me all the time. She also often said: ‘Why are all your pictures so wonky and distorted?’ At the time I was into painting ordinary objects and distorting them, such as this ketchup bottle.

Drunken ketchup

Drunken ketchup

She wanted me to paint the sea, or flowers. I like painting the sea (I’m rubbish at flowers). I went through a phase of painting nothing but the sea. I now have a house full of sea paintings.

 

The sea, the sea

The sea, the sea

However, generally I’ve resisted the urge to paint pretty things (I don’t think I do pretty things justice). But whenever I try to paint pretty things, people seem to react and they seem to react positively. Take this chick painting.

My little chick

My little chick

The comments I had on Facebook (and the 37 ‘likes’) in response to this painting (which incidentally, took me an hour to paint), were very flattering and positive. They gave me a warm glow (and still do).

The comments included: ‘love’, ‘brilliant’, ‘I’ve just showed this to Niel and he thought it was real’, ‘wow’, ‘its beautiful’, ‘I think it is brilliant’.

These comments were overwhelming, and really much welcomed. Comments such as this make me realise that painting and drawing are my ‘bag’ and I shouldn’t give up despite times of great doubt.

However, when I post art on Facebook that I feel more passionate about or that I’ve put more sweat into, such as a painting or a video I’ve been working on for a bigger project, I don’t seem to receive the same level of response. Sometimes I don’t get any response. I don’t understand why. I want my art to touch people.  The whole point of me working on bigger projects is to have some sort of impact and provoke an emotional response. This differentiation in response from the world makes me question my subject matter and my passion for meaningful art. Should I stick to realistic art, pretty art, and the art that people seem to like the best?

A few months ago, a tutor at college gave a demonstration on landscape painting using gouache. After he had finished, we were encourage to have a go. I created a rough painting in response. This piece took me half an hour to create. I posted this to Facebook.

My first ever landscape

My first ever landscape

This picture gathered 25 likes and comments such as: ‘Gorgeous’, ‘Brilliant’, ‘Love it’, OMG that’s amazing’, ‘1/2 hour??’

When, a few months after this, I posted another painting on Facebook. The audience didn’t respond at all. I like this piece much more than the landscape painting. It took a lot longer to create, it has more meaning for me (it relates to my response to a very rare, historic First World War medal) and I think it shows more technical skill. It is part of a much bigger project. So why was the half-hour sketchy landscape appreciated more?

Croix de Guerre

Croix de Guerre

My heart is more in my odd, distorted, object paintings and drawings and my videos about people and things than it is in pretty art. I strive to get more likes for the odd paintings and projects. I will still dabble in pretty art now and then (everyone needs the odd boost to the self-esteem) but I hope that I get equal responses for both one day.

 

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged | Leave a comment

Is it possible to love things?

Today I was cycling to college and I was thinking about love. I can’t remember now what triggered that topic (there’s not much to love between my house and Shrewsbury College).

Specifically, I was thinking about the fact that love has so many different aspects and levels to it. You have the love you feel for the family you were born with, the love you feel for the family you create, lustful ‘love’ for those you admire close by, idolized ‘love’ for those you admire from afar, romantic ‘love’ once love is reciprocated, friendship love, the love you feel for your non-human companions (meow) and the love of things. I suspect that many will agree that all of these types of love exist except the last one.

This man loves his cat

This man loves his cat

Can I love my boots as much as I love my cat?

Can I love my boots as much as I love my cat?

However, I think the love of things is as valid as romantic or familial love (and it can be very intense). It is viewed as shallow to say you love things. The lover of things is accused of being materialistic. That is a very superficial judgement. It would certainly be regarded as slightly off-kilter psychologically to put the love of things above the love of people. However, this happens. I’m sure that people have parted ways through one partner’s love  for a particular object or collection of objects.

There can be a syneasthetic blending of some of these types of love. The love of objects can spill over into lustful or romantic love, or more usually, familial love. These are extreme. Most people love things as well as people.

This lady wants to marry her car

This lady wants to marry her car

Why do we feel love for objects? I think it is because we crave them when we first see them. We ‘have’ to have them. We feel a sense of fulfillment when we finally obtain that object and we feel a comfort by an object’s presence, just as we do by a pet or a partner, or parent or sibling. We enjoy spending time with them and miss them when they aren’t there.

Would you be happy without your things?

Would you be happy without your things?

One school of thought believes that designers and engineers play on our love of objects and our natural inclination to humanize them by creating similarities between objects and the human form: cars that look like they have faces, cars (again) have genders (usually female) and some objects are designed to mirror the human figure in terms of smooth curves or muscly torso. This might account for what attracts us initially to objects but in my opinion it is our need to connect to objects and find comfort in them that keeps the love.

I love my boots. Don’t you dare try to take them away from me!

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Do drugs make for better art?

Recently I watched a news item on the BBC News website which asks whether ex-drug addict artists could produce good work? Or at least, it asks, could they, once drug free, produce art of the same high standard as that which they produced under the influence? The article is very interesting and it puts forwards valid points for both sides of the argument, yet it concludes that, yes, they can, and the art they produce whilst under the influence is valid (and perhaps just different).

This gets my creative juices flowing

This gets my creative juices flowing

This article interests me for many reasons. Firstly, I find that I can’t draw or paint as well if I’ve had alcohol and I don’t feel particularly inspired if I’ve had a glass of wine. So to me that indicates that drugs do not help creativity. If anything, it feel as if I am having a break from creative thinking if I’ve had some wine to drink.

However, if I drink that other legal and common drug, caffeine, I feel very inspired and fired up for work. I love coffee. I feel content and complete if I have a large Americano mid-morning. After that coffee, I feel the ideas come to me, the energy flows and the desire to create is heightened. So for me, drugs, depending on the type, both help and hinder me with my creative outflow.

 

This doesn't make me want to get my paintbrush out

This doesn’t make me want to get my paintbrush out

I can’t comment on potent or illegal drugs not having taken any myself, but I remember someone with depression telling me once that they are only creative when they aren’t taking antidepressant medication. They found that the antidepressant medication stifled their creativity. When they were depressed and anxious, but without medication, the ideas flowed. So is that the choice? A life free of anxiety (and full of sedating-type drugs) or a life full of art (and stimulating drugs or no drugs at all)?

It that stimulating drugs (caffeine) and an over-stimulated mind (madness) spur creativity yet sedating drugs (a big glass of wine) or mind-calming drugs (antidepressants) stifle it?

As has been observed here before (and by many others), many creative people suffer from anxiety and depression (the cliche of the ‘mad artist’). So perhaps there are a lot of creative types who face this dilemma.

I think I have to accept my life as a caffeine-fueled creative madwoman if I am to continue as a part-time artist. However, I will enjoy a glass of wine when I want a break from thinking about paint.

That explains why I, and other artists, love coffee shops so much.

Strong coffee and sketch pad - the two essential ingredients for an arty farty image

Strong coffee and sketch pad – the two essential ingredients for an arty farty image

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

An exhibition of thoughts

At the moment, I am a third the way through my current art assessment in terms of time (days, weeks, months). The assignment was issued in the middle of November and hand-in date is 19th May. Details about the project can be found here. However, I am at currently that stage of a project where I am full of thoughts and ideas yet I feel as if I’ve hardly done anything real or practical. I’ve only got my paintbrush out twice, I’ve had two half-hour sessions with a bit of clay, and I’ve spent about one hour editing video. That’s not very good for two months’ work. I have nothing to show the world. On the other hand, I’ve already filled one sketchbook with notes, thoughts and research.

I was cycling home from college yesterday after another day spent reading and writing notes and I thought, it’s a shame I can’t just have an exhibition of my thoughts or ideas. I’m ready in terms of thoughts and ideas. That would save me doing all the hard work and the next few months could then be quite relaxing.

Someone has beaten me to it.

Someone has beaten me to it.

Perhaps one day that will be possible, when we have mind-reading technology and my thoughts can be extracted digitally and printed with a 3D printer.

I doubt this will be possible before May though.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Can you be an artist without also being a philosopher?

I often have random thought whenever I am cycling, doing Zumba or driving along the M54.

This time, a thought came to me as I was cycling home from dropping off my children at school. The thought was: do philosophy and art always go hand in hand? Are all artists also philosophers?

The motorway where I have lots of thoughts - the M54

The motorway where I have lots of thoughts – the M54

I seem to spend a lot of my time philosophizing about things. I also draw, paint and make videos. Give me a topic and I will go away and think about it, analyze it, churn it around in my head, write about it, ask people about it and then draw or paint something in response.

I’ve always liked philosophizing and questioning things, even during dry spells in my art. However, I don’t profess to be very academic in my philosophizing. There is a very deep end to the study of philosophy and I see myself as paddling around in the shallow end, with arm bands and a float. Hopefully that’s deep enough for me to have credibility as an artist.

This boy is an artist in the pool of philosophy

This boy is an artist in the pool of philosophy

Hegel (a famous philosopher) believed art and philosophy to be very closely entwined. He thought that together they constituted the ‘Absolute Spirit’. Other philosophers have asked: what part does science play? I see the three as aiming for the same thing just with slightly different methods or emphasis on process: an explanation. Why are we here? What are we? I prod therefore I am.

Hegel - he was too busy thinking to look happy

Hegel – he was too busy thinking to look happy

In a way, art, like philosophy, aims to reflect this weird thing called life. It depicts life and the relations between people in their interaction with the world but with a particular focus. An indispensable feature of art is the way it looks at life from a tangential perspective. Perhaps the difference between an artist and a philosopher is that the latter uses images to question life whereas the former uses just words. Or perhaps the artist is different because he or she just takes an snippet of the bigger question. It would be just too much to tackle everything in one go.

I like to take an aspect of life, whatever it may be, and examine it closely. If something catches my attention I will ask questions about it. What does it mean? What does it even mean? I don’t know the answer to that, but I could draw it and see.

References

Wikipedia article about Hegel Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Wilhelm_Friedrich_Hegel [last accessed 15 December 2014]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

How important is colour?

I’ve been thinking about colour a lot recently. Colour is vitally important to me. As I have synesthesia, I see colour all the time (even as I type this, all the letters are in colour – orange, white, grey, white, pale brown, red for the world colour by the way). I can’t imagine a world without colour. I use colour in my art a lot.

Colour is everywhere

Colour is everywhere

I’ve been thinking recently about what would happen if I stopped using colour, or at least if I reduced the number and / or intensity of colours I could use. I have been wondering how difficult would it be to use only other elements available to me to create an artwork with impact: composition, subject matter, technical skill, contrast, light, dark and size. How would I cope if I were to forbid myself the use of colour?

The next project I am hoping to work on is about the First World War, specifically, objects and the First World War and how relevant they are to us today (and what ‘trace’ they leave of the time when they were extremely important to someone). I’ve been considering the prospect of using a lack of colour in this project as to me the First World War is about a lack of colour. I see the objects from the war as colourful but the environment they were in as colourless. How do the people who own the objects view them?

The colour of war

The colour of war

I asked my Facebook friends to name the first colour that comes to mind when they think of the First World War. These are the results so far. Red and brown are competing for the leader spot. I don’t see red, I only see brown, a dingy, dirty, muddy, shiny brown: the colour of clay.

The Pie Chart of colours

The Pie Chart of colours

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Call myself a proper artist – I missed the Turner Prize 2014 announcements

I was much shocked and surprised to realise yesterday evening that I’d missed the announcement of the winner of the Turner Prize 2014 this year. Two years’ ago I had been gripped to the TV for the announcement of the winner (Elizabeth Price). This year I was too busy watching The Gilmore Girls to notice the event.

Comfort TV

Comfort TV

I have been living in a bit of a bubble recently, impenetrable by news. I haven’t had time to check the BBC News website or watch the news on TV for weeks.

So today I’ve read up about it, retrospectively. Apparently the art world is underwhelmed by the event. Perhaps that explains their relative silence.

The winner was an artist who is the same age as me, which fills me with hope (maybe it’ll be my turn next year). Duncan Campbell is a video artist from Glasgow. However, reading about his work today I realise that intellectually, he’s on a plane far above me. His video was about objects. Although I am also interested in objects, I can’t compare any messages I hope to spread with his work. He describes his winning piece as an ‘essay film’. I like that.

Duncan Campbell having an arty farty coffee

Duncan Campbell having an arty farty coffee

I also like this comment about him that I read today. Jennifer Higgie, editor of Frieze, said: ‘He’s a really compelling filmmaker. I’ve noticed that when his films are shown in galleries people will sit through 45 minutes and no one will leave.’ In my experience, people in art galleries usually seem to last at most 15 minutes in front of video artwork, so this is high praise I think.

I also like what Campbell said himself about his art: he strives to find what Samuel Beckett termed a ‘form that accommodates the mess’. In other words, the viewer can’t engage with the form of the artwork without a sense of the mess that accommodates it. This gives me something to think about.

References

Clark, N.  1 December 2014. ‘Turner Prize 2014: Video artist Duncan Campbell wins prestigious award’, The Independent online. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/turner-prize-2014-video-artist-duncan-campbell-wins-9896603.html [last accessed 2 December 2014]

BBC News website. 1 December 2014. ‘Turner Prize 2014: Duncan Campbell wins £25,000 prize’. Available from http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/turner-prize-2014-video-artist-duncan-campbell-wins-9896603.html [last accessed 2 December 2014]

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment